Just wondering, honestly, just wondering...

So, I'm checking out the HISTORY books and am wondering exactly when did the Blacks of this country suddenly decide to take the side of a party that- 1. Formed the KKK to keep Blacks from having civil rights in this country, 2- overwhelmingly voted AGAINST giving Blacks equal protections under the law time and time again, including the Civil Rights Laws of the mid 60s?


Has America just decided to forgive the Democrat Party for it's past ills? I mean, IF the Nazi party announced a Jew as their new leader, would that make them 'better'? Would the Nazis be forgiven if a lot of Jews joined the party as well?


Just saying is all, just saying.

My guess would be they started turnining to thr democrat side (DARK SIDE) right after MLK assassination if I were to guess. They started offering them all the free entitlements to suck them in to another form of slavery.

I dont think they have forgiven the democrats for the past. I think they have forgotten completely about past history.

In the late 60's, early 70's, the democrats changed their strategy. They lost when they tried to keep blacks from getting their rights in the early 60's and they realized that they no longer had the power to 'keep blacks in their place'.

They wanted that power back. In order to get that power they needed new voters. What they came up with was ingenious, they'd get the blacks themselves to vote for them using a new strategy. What they did was start pushing for welfare, food stamps, etc to be provided. These things are available to all poor, but they were originally targeted at blacks.

By offering these things they got blacks to vote for them. Basically it amounts to, "We'll pay you to vote for us!". Of course they pay just enough to keep their new voter base alive and comfortable without paying them enough to better their lifestyle. After all they don't want them moving to nice neighborhoods or anything. They make just enough that they scoff at the idea of getting a minimum wage job. Why should they work for the same or less then they get handed? Add to that they are kept in their physical location in big cities, the ghettos, by the welfare system itself. If you live in a zip code that is on a predetermined list, you automatically qualify for welfare just by applying. Outside of those areas you need to meet certain standards to qualify. So this tends to keep the ghetto blacks in the ghetto.

Basically the Democrats could no longer order the blacks to keep their place because they didn't have the votes. But by using welfare as a bribe, they got the blacks to provide the votes needed to keep themselves in their place.

Interestingly people claim that originally the Republicans were liberal and Democrats were Conservative but then they switched. Which is true to an extent. The Democrats wanted to keep things the same and not give any rights to blacks and other minorities. The Republicans wanted to give them equal rights and the chance to make a go at life like everybody else. The Republicans were seen as on the blacks side and the Democrats not. So the Republicans looked far more liberal than the Democrats.

After the Democrats changed strategies, they were calling for giving handouts to blacks. And the Republicans were saying, "No handouts! Get a job, we made that possible." So suddenly the Democrats were seen as on the blacks side and the Republicans no longer were.

That's why they claim now that the two parties switched sides. But in reality the Democrats switched sides to get a new voter base, and the Republicans stayed where they were. It's just that the Democrats used to be to the right of the Republicans making the Republicans look liberal in comparison, and now the Democrats moved to the left of Republicans making the Republicans look Conservative in comparison.

Thank you Eber. My mother once told me of a book idea she had. It opened in the South, in a laboratory in the waning months of the Civil War. Two scientists were looking at a third person in a chair and they were discussing the finalization of their plans.

'Now that you look like them, you can move amongst them and work against them from the inside. You will have to contain your disgust and procreate to raise a line of Whites that think as you do, but will look as they do. Only then can we ultimately keep these Negroes under control as is proper.

When we see who they are speaking to, it is a Black man, youngish and he is nodding in agreement and says, it shall be done.

Next chapters are full of moments in American History that bolstered the stereotypes that Blacks in America have gained throughout the centuries, and all could be traced back to this one man and that one laboratory.

BTW, if any of you write this story and make some money from it, I'd appreciate a little from the sales or any other revenue gained. I won't sue for it, I would just appreciate it. If not, that is also alright too.

eber322 wrote:

In the late 60's, early 70's, the democrats changed their strategy. They lost when they tried to keep blacks from getting their rights in the early 60's and they realized that they no longer had the power to 'keep blacks in their place'.

They wanted that power back. In order to get that power they needed new voters. What they came up with was ingenious, they'd get the blacks themselves to vote for them using a new strategy. What they did was start pushing for welfare, food stamps, etc to be provided. These things are available to all poor, but they were originally targeted at blacks.

By offering these things they got blacks to vote for them. Basically it amounts to, "We'll pay you to vote for us!". Of course they pay just enough to keep their new voter base alive and comfortable without paying them enough to better their lifestyle. After all they don't want them moving to nice neighborhoods or anything. They make just enough that they scoff at the idea of getting a minimum wage job. Why should they work for the same or less then they get handed? Add to that they are kept in their physical location in big cities, the ghettos, by the welfare system itself. If you live in a zip code that is on a predetermined list, you automatically qualify for welfare just by applying. Outside of those areas you need to meet certain standards to qualify. So this tends to keep the ghetto blacks in the ghetto.

Basically the Democrats could no longer order the blacks to keep their place because they didn't have the votes. But by using welfare as a bribe, they got the blacks to provide the votes needed to keep themselves in their place.

Interestingly people claim that originally the Republicans were liberal and Democrats were Conservative but then they switched. Which is true to an extent. The Democrats wanted to keep things the same and not give any rights to blacks and other minorities. The Republicans wanted to give them equal rights and the chance to make a go at life like everybody else. The Republicans were seen as on the blacks side and the Democrats not. So the Republicans looked far more liberal than the Democrats.

After the Democrats changed strategies, they were calling for giving handouts to blacks. And the Republicans were saying, "No handouts! Get a job, we made that possible." So suddenly the Democrats were seen as on the blacks side and the Republicans no longer were.

That's why they claim now that the two parties switched sides. But in reality the Democrats switched sides to get a new voter base, and the Republicans stayed where they were. It's just that the Democrats used to be to the right of the Republicans making the Republicans look liberal in comparison, and now the Democrats moved to the left of Republicans making the Republicans look Conservative in comparison.

Which is why they want amnesty.

Quote :

In the late 60's, early 70's, the democrats changed their strategy. They lost when they tried to keep blacks from getting their rights in the early 60's and they realized that they no longer had the power to 'keep blacks in their place'.

They wanted that power back. In order to get that power they needed new voters. What they came up with was ingenious, they'd get the blacks themselves to vote for them using a new strategy. What they did was start pushing for welfare, food stamps, etc to be provided. These things are available to all poor, but they were originally targeted at blacks.

By offering these things they got blacks to vote for them. Basically it amounts to, "We'll pay you to vote for us!". Of course they pay just enough to keep their new voter base alive and comfortable without paying them enough to better their lifestyle. After all they don't want them moving to nice neighborhoods or anything. They make just enough that they scoff at the idea of getting a minimum wage job. Why should they work for the same or less then they get handed? Add to that they are kept in their physical location in big cities, the ghettos, by the welfare system itself. If you live in a zip code that is on a predetermined list, you automatically qualify for welfare just by applying. Outside of those areas you need to meet certain standards to qualify. So this tends to keep the ghetto blacks in the ghetto.

Basically the Democrats could no longer order the blacks to keep their place because they didn't have the votes. But by using welfare as a bribe, they got the blacks to provide the votes needed to keep themselves in their place.

Interestingly people claim that originally the Republicans were liberal and Democrats were Conservative but then they switched. Which is true to an extent. The Democrats wanted to keep things the same and not give any rights to blacks and other minorities. The Republicans wanted to give them equal rights and the chance to make a go at life like everybody else. The Republicans were seen as on the blacks side and the Democrats not. So the Republicans looked far more liberal than the Democrats.

After the Democrats changed strategies, they were calling for giving handouts to blacks. And the Republicans were saying, "No handouts! Get a job, we made that possible." So suddenly the Democrats were seen as on the blacks side and the Republicans no longer were.

That's why they claim now that the two parties switched sides. But in reality the Democrats switched sides to get a new voter base, and the Republicans stayed where they were. It's just that the Democrats used to be to the right of the Republicans making the Republicans look liberal in comparison, and now the Democrats moved to the left of Republicans making the Republicans look Conservative in comparison.

This is total BS. All the racist democrats left the party and went to the republican party. Like Strohm Thurman. When they left the republican party started suppressing blacks.

LOL, gosh how I love how THAT fallicy still has some support/ In fact, most of those that jumped ship went back to their original party once they realized the Republicans were serious about Civil Rights. Notice also, more Republicans were behind Civil Rights laws than Democrats. I am sure THAT could be why we are truly where we are.

Pissedoffvulcan wrote:

Which is why they want amnesty.

That's exactly right. They need a new batch of voters to keep power, so why not the illegal aliens?

Bob wrote:

This is total BS. All the racist democrats left the party and went to the republican party. Like Strohm Thurman. When they left the republican party started suppressing blacks.

Just for you Zombie Bob. You keep regurgitating the Democrat propaganda while you search for brains of your own.

Careful, Bob might pull a 'VIEW' and storm off!

ssvs04 wrote:

I dont think they have forgiven the democrats for the past. I think they have forgotten completely about past history.

To be fair, many may not have ever been taught history accurately, so they couldn't have forgotten it. A lot of what is being taught is revisionist.

The left has been controlling the educational system for a while now.

eber322 wrote:

Pissedoffvulcan wrote:

Which is why they want amnesty.

That's exactly right. They need a new batch of voters to keep power, so why not the illegal aliens?

Exactly, this is their strategy. It's to be expected from the left.

This is why it is so much worse when politicians such as McCain, who claim to be Republican or Conservative have soft stances on illegal immigration in order to provide cheap, exploitable labor for their business pals. This is supposed to be the group that supports rule of law, and the enforcement of the laws that we have.

As far as I'm concerned, the only proper stance is rounding up every single illegal alien in this country, by whatever means necessary, & deporting them. If they then wish to re-enter, they can apply for entry like everyone else. Of course, they would have a record of having entered illegally to contend with, and that may influence their eligibility.

Don't try to hand me any of this "path to citizenship" felgercarb either, it's simply doublespeak for amnesty, which was already done in 1986 and failed miserably.

Quote :

As far as I'm concerned, the only proper stance is rounding up every single illegal alien in this country, by whatever means necessary, & deporting them. If they then wish to re-enter, they can apply for entry like everyone else. Of course, they would have a record of having entered illegally to contend with, and that may influence their eligibility.

Couldn't agree with you more! Which also underlines my disgust for the Republican Party of today!

Walterth3rd wrote:

Quote :

As far as I'm concerned, the only proper stance is rounding up every single illegal alien in this country, by whatever means necessary, & deporting them. If they then wish to re-enter, they can apply for entry like everyone else. Of course, they would have a record of having entered illegally to contend with, and that may influence their eligibility.

Couldn't agree with you more! Which also underlines my disgust for the Republican Party of today!

Somebody after my own heart! And someone who doesnt sleep much like me also. LOL!

Hey Bob! How about going back to some of those other posts and and answering the questions posted to you?

SSVS04 that dog won't hunt! Bob won't actually ANSWER those questions because BOB hasn't an idea HOW to answer those questions! I'd be surprised if he came back. So many visitors to our site, just don't seem to GET IT when it comes to EDUCATED responses. :study:

Walterth3rd wrote:

Careful, Bob might pull a 'VIEW' and storm off!

BAHAHAHAHAHA I seen that poo funny as hell.

ssvs04 wrote:

Hey Bob! How about going back to some of those other posts and and answering the questions posted to you?

You think Bob is going to do that? He is going to do what liberals do best hit and run.