Hillary is done for 2016

Hillary does not have a snow ball chance in winning 2016 Benghazi is her downfall.

I wouldn't bet the farm on that. At this point in the game, I wouldn't bet 5 cents on it.

1: Unlike Republicans/Conservatives, the Democrats don't tend to hold their candidates' to any standards whatsoever. Look what happened to George Bush v1.0. He went back on his "No New Taxes" pledge and was tossed out of office 2 years later. In 1996, Slick Willie was embroiled in the Monica Lewinsky affair, which brought shame upon the White House, and that didn't bother his supporters a bit. They happily re-elected him.

2: 2016 is a LONG way off in political terms, particularly when the primary source of information for a large percentage of the population is the MSM. Their lips are firmly planted on the lefts backside that they won't remind people, either.

3: And Democrats aren't all that bright, they are Democrats, after all. They aren't likely to remember on their own.

The only way any shlt will stick to her is if Obama uses her to wipe it off him.

It does seem to be about smearing Hillary.

Annoyed wrote:

3: And Democrats aren't all that bright, they are Democrats, after all. They aren't likely to remember on their own.

That's a bit of a blanket statement don't you think?

ilaugh wrote:

It does seem to be about smearing Hillary.

Annoyed wrote:

3: And Democrats aren't all that bright, they are Democrats, after all. They aren't likely to remember on their own.

That's a bit of a blanket statement don't you think?

I would agree with you if not for so much damming evidence. I do not think Hillary is the target I think Obama is. Rightfully so.

The only argument leveled at Obama that I really see is that maybe he's soft on terrorism. Obama's on his second term, and they wont be able to run him out of office on this. That's why I think it's aimed at Hillary Clinton.

ilaugh wrote:

The only argument leveled at Obama that I really see is that maybe he's soft on terrorism. Obama's on his second term, and they wont be able to run him out of office on this. That's why I think it's aimed at Hillary Clinton.

No they wont run him out of office. However this will damage his legacy forever. Obama is all about legacy. Obama has bigger aspirations after the White House. He wants to be chairman of the United Nations. This is not my theory but some democrats theory.

Pissedoffvulcan wrote:

No they wont run him out of office. However this will damage his legacy forever. Obama is all about legacy. Obama has bigger aspirations after the White House. He wants to be chairman of the United Nations. This is not my theory but some democrats theory.

I don't know where that's coming from, but it sounds like wild speculation to me.

ilaugh wrote:

It does seem to be about smearing Hillary.

Annoyed wrote:

3: And Democrats aren't all that bright, they are Democrats, after all. They aren't likely to remember on their own.

That's a bit of a blanket statement don't you think?

Not really. If you look at their ideals and the policies they advocate, there isn't a lot of intelligent behavior there.

Annoyed wrote:

ilaugh wrote:

It does seem to be about smearing Hillary.

Annoyed wrote:

3: And Democrats aren't all that bright, they are Democrats, after all. They aren't likely to remember on their own.

That's a bit of a blanket statement don't you think?

Not really. If you look at their ideals and the policies they advocate, there isn't a lot of intelligent behavior there.

You could say similar things about theists as well, and I know that there's intelligent believers. :twisted: