- Bandit wrote:
- But what an amazingly interesting article. I WAS FLOORED!
If you want to know what's going on with minimum wage or work in the restaurant/food industry business, read this.
Why raise min wage? Because the "cats out of the bag" now, that's why. Ask yourself this. How many other businesses have lobbying groups that do the exact same thing?
NRA
The only aspect that I can agree with is the tipped employees. This doesn't affect the fast food joints too much.
But based on personal experience long ago, I've avoided restaurants in general, in large part because of this.
It is indeed the practice of many sit down restaurants to pay their employees a sub-minimum wage on the assumption that they will make it up in tips. Problem is that the only employees who actually get the tips are those that work the dining room floor, with direct customer contact. Those who labor in the kitchen, while making the same sub-min. wage as the floor staff, often don't get a fair share of the tips, if they get any at all.
Back in the early 70's, when I was in school, I got a job at a large chain restaurant. Being male, I was employed in the kitchen doing various jobs. This restaurant had tendency to put males in the kitchen, and females out on the floor, particularly if the female in question was what is now referred to as a "hottie".
Took me about 3 working days to realize that while all these employees, male and female, were making sub-min. wage on the assumption of tips, but mostly female floor staff were making a great deal more than those of us in the kitchen, as the kitchen folks were not getting accurate percentage of the tips collected by the floor staff.
I brought this concern to the manager of the place, he stated that he'd look into it.
Next payday, I could see by my check that nothing had changed. Again, I took this up with the manager, and he replied that there wouldn't be any changes as it was the floor staff who was responsible for bringing in the tips; their personal attributes, attitudes and friendliness towards the customer was responsible for much of the quantities of the tips they brought in.
So, I clarified, that we are all paid sub-min. wage on the assumption that it would be made up in tips, but those in backs would never get an even distribution. Yes, that was the situation.
Quit the job on the spot, and tripped the fire suppression system on my way out the back door. Shut him down cold on a Friday night. Heck, I wasn't 16 yet, so I couldn't really be charged with anything serious.
Since that day, I've avoided sit down restaurants, and that situation, which continues to this day, is a large reason why.
The entire tipping system should be scrapped and the all of the employees paid an hourly wage commensurate to what their efforts contribute to the businesses income.
None of this applies to fast food joints, though.
Let me ask you something. How much are you willing to pay for a Whopper/Big Mac or whatever? Around here, they're running about 5 bucks unless you have a coupon of some sort.
What happens if they are forced to double the wages of the people that make them? The cost of the product would rise. Are you going to pay $10 bucks for a whopper? Hell, I won't pay $5, I always use a coupon or I don't go there.
What, do you think management is going to eat the cost increase? Of course not, don't be silly.
So, how many whoppers are they going to need to have cooked when few if any people are buying them? They're going to need a lot less people to flip those burgers they're not selling.
This is a perfect example of the value of a product vs. the cost of the product. If the cost exceeds the perceived value to the customer, it won't sell, unless some artificial interference is introduced. Or do you plan on giving govt. subsidies to fast food joints so that they can pay their workers more than the value of what they produce?