Why doesn't this surprise me?

Why doesn't this surprise me?
Oh, yeah, that's right. Because myself and many others saw it coming a long time ago.

http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=11517Using

Not surprising since most homosexuals are pedophiles. That 3% of the population is responsible for 33% of child molestations each year in this country.

Is there a newer article? This one was back in October and I would like to know id there is a follow-up putting those CREEPS in their places!

eber322 wrote:

Not surprising since most homosexuals are pedophiles.

Emm. I'd like to see the data on this. I'm not a flag waver for the gay community, but I don't particularly agree with blanket statements. Both sides use them and most are patently unfair.

justmemyselfandi wrote:

eber322 wrote:

Not surprising since most homosexuals are pedophiles.

Emm. I'd like to see the data on this. I'm not a flag waver for the gay community, but I don't particularly agree with blanket statements. Both sides use them and most are patently unfair.

Me too. I have never associated the two. Pedophilia is a serious crime in my book with no hope of rehabilitation. It should require castration. If the punishment fit the crime more people would be law abiding citizens. So many people are gay that they should come with signs because I'm always the last one to figure that out. I seem to miss all the subtext that you guys get.

Gotta go Isaac is seriously knocking at the door. The one thing I didn't remove from the deck just hit the door. If I don't get blown away or loose electricty, I'll be back.

Tuck wrote:

justmemyselfandi wrote:

eber322 wrote:

Not surprising since most homosexuals are pedophiles.

Emm. I'd like to see the data on this. I'm not a flag waver for the gay community, but I don't particularly agree with blanket statements. Both sides use them and most are patently unfair.

Me too. I have never associated the two. Pedophilia is a serious crime in my book with no hope of rehabilitation. It should require castration. If the punishment fit the crime more people would be law abiding citizens. So many people are gay that they should come with signs because I'm always the last one to figure that out. I seem to miss all the subtext that you guys get.

Gotta go Isaac is seriously knocking at the door. The one thing I didn't remove from the deck just hit the door. If I don't get blown away or loose electricty, I'll be back.

I'll be REALLY honest about this, as most pedophiles have a preference, I don't see why 'we' should differentiate from those that prefer little BOYS from those that prefer little girls.
No, I misspoke, the ones that are male that like little MALES are HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILES! PERIOD!!! Not that it is 'better' if they just went after little girls, but it IS different! Still bad, still EVIL, but different. A difference in this case,that should also be pointed out!

The one thing that gets me about these molesters is that so many people are shocked when they find out that these people are from all walks of life and on all sides of the political and morale lines.

Doctors, lawyers, Indian Chiefs, ect. Republicans, Democrats. Hell they had a bureaucrat working in Homeland security get popped on a sting, when he thought he was talking to a 12 year old on the internet. Stupid depraved individuals.

These people are sexual vampires that prey on the innocence of children to gratify the most base desires on the planet. They care nothing for those they target and have the academics giving them a pass on their responsibility in perpetrating the Evil they do. The educators say that these people are sick and need their help. That way the shrinks can make money trying to straighten them out while they make money helping the children they assault.

Now I ask you. Who exactly are the predators. The molesters or the shrinks?

Walterth3rd wrote:

I'll be REALLY honest about this, as most pedophiles have a preference, I don't see why 'we' should differentiate from those that prefer little BOYS from those that prefer little girls.
No, I misspoke, the ones that are male that like little MALES are HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILES! PERIOD!!! Not that it is 'better' if they just went after little girls, but it IS different! Still bad, still EVIL, but different. A difference in this case,that should also be pointed out!

Well, I've never really gotten into it that far. I know a few gay people and I really don't particularly life the use of labels on people. We have too many labels in use now, because of the Politically Correct crowd. The two key words in any type of relationship is (a) Consenting adults and (b) Not harming others. Pedophiles fit in neither of these.

As a person that was molested many times as a child, this law doesn't go far enough. I NEVER gave consent, of course I was well under 17 (I was 6) so maybe I was young enough to be protected by your 'plan'.

:scratch:

Walterth3rd wrote:

As a person that was molested many times as a child, this law doesn't go far enough. I NEVER gave consent, of course I was well under 17 (I was 6) so maybe I was young enough to be protected by your 'plan'.

:scratch:

Well, I'm very sorry for what happened to you. I think it's disgusting and perverted to even think of touching a child in a sexual nature, but I think Skycastle was talking more about young adults, who's mentality is capable of considering the implications of sexual contact.

As far as the age of consent, I've seen people below that age who were far more mature than some who are above it. I think that age was placed there at a time that younger adults were far less able to have the information about sex and lifestyle issues than they are today.

Skycastle wrote:

Sorry to hear that, Walter. That was wrong. I can't remember anything that happened to me at the age of 6.

justmemyselfandi wrote:

but I think Skycastle was talking more about young adults, who's mentality is capable of considering the implications of sexual contact.

As far as the age of consent, I've seen people below that age who were far more mature than some who are above it. I think that age was placed there at a time that younger adults were far less able to have the information about sex and lifestyle issues than they are today.

Yes, I was talking about young adults. They routinely have sex with others under 18, yet we don't go crazy over that and throw them all in jail. The double-standard here is huge and irrational. And I know that kids as young as 12 (even younger, actually) have sex in schoolyards - a girl I know did that. So young people really understand sex these days, much more so than when I was growing up.

The world is changing, my friend and It's imposible to put the genie back into the bottle.

IF you wanted to turn it back, first you'd have get rid of the internet. The internet has corrupted kids, and every one for that matter, worse then anything else ever. Second rollback FCC rules for tv to the 80's, early 90's at the latest. Then get rid of all those cellphones, plus all those other worthless little gadgets kids us to text and send naked pics to each other. It's all this worthless technology that has corrupted the world over the last twenty years.

It's people who are corrupting people. It's the thirst for sensation that drives people to find something that stimulates them. It's not the technology It's the idea of being naughty. I remember the first time I looked at a Playboy. It was not the fault of the presses that printed it. It was my thought of seeing something that was forbidden to me by society.

justmemyselfandi wrote:

It's people who are corrupting people.

You're right, but the technology has enabled the wide spread of it. And Playboy doesn't compare to internet porn, even hardcore mags like Hustler don't. The internet has allowed the weird sickos that eat other peoples poo, have sex with animals, etc, etc to spread their filth to millions where without it, they could have corrupted a hand full tops. And kids younger than five are seeing all that stuff. I saw my first dirty mag in elementary school, but I was still nearly totally innocent to the act of sex in high school. That just doesn't happen nowadays thanks to the internet. Now the vast majority of third graders have seen worse porn then I did until I saw the internet for the first time in my twenties. That's why kids are having sex at such an earlier age, because they are exposed to it from the time they are big enough to sit at a computer and click a mouse. That's why if I had kids I wouldn't have internet in the house.

I think the Government has steadily turned the schools into sex education arenas, even putting the book http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Has_Two_Mommies


The government and the Liberals are tooth and nail trying to show your kids just how wrong they think you are by indoctrination. If the internet never existed, do you really think any kid is safe.

You're right. Schools need to be over hauled as well. If I had kids, I'd either have to home school them or send them to Catholic school. No way would I put them in public school. They're teaching kids to be gay and promiscuous.

That's standard policy. If anybody dares question those things they are considered "nut jobs", "homophobes", "intolerant" and "religious wackos" therefore they are ignored.

To a large degree, the public education system in this country has been perverted into a left wing indoctrination system.

Yeah, 100% is a large degree alright.